ALL the News about
Mormons, Mormonism
and the LDS Church
Mormon News: All the News about Mormons, Mormonism and the LDS Church
Posted 24 Feb 2001   For week ended May 21, 2000
Most Recent Week
Front Page
Local News
Arts & Entertainment
·New Products
·New Websites
·Mormon Stock Index
Letters to Editor
Continuing Coverage of:
Boston Temple
School Prayer
Julie on MTV
Robert Elmer Kleasen
About Mormon News
News by E-Mail
Weekly Summary
Submitting News
Submitting Press Releases
Volunteer Positions
Bad Link?

News about Mormons, Mormonism,
and the LDS Church
Sent on Mormon-News: 17May00

Summarized by Kent Larsen

Different City Council, Same Decision: LDS Church to Build Main Street Plaza
Salt Lake Tribune 17May00 N1
By Rebecca Walsh: Salt Lake Tribune

SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH -- Even thought the Salt Lake City Council has different members from the council that approved the sale of a block-long section of main street to the LDS Church, the council still approved the April 1999 decision, passing an amendment affirming and clarifying the decision.

The city council has three new members, and since the April decision, it has heard public complaints and had to pay to defend the city in two lawsuits filed by the ACLU over the decision. But the council still says that the decision to sell was their intention. "I was here last April," said Councilman Keith Christensen. "We had a very careful, very open, very deliberate discussion. This body understood exactly what it was doing. This action only helps others understand our intention."

Last night's decision came at the suggestion of City Attorney Roger Cutler, who thinks that the decision will help avoid the second lawsuit filed by the ACLU. The second lawsuit is more concerned with the process the city used to pass the ordinance than the constitutionality of the sale, which is the subject of the first lawsuit.

The three new council members, all of whom are LDS Church members, all voted to adopt the amendment and approve the sale. The only non-LDS Church member on the council, Tom Rogan, voted against the amendment. Rogan says that the problem comes from how the sale was presented to the public, "The problem is one of twisted presentations," Rogan said. "One of the church officials said this would be a 'little bit of Paris.' It would have been better if they would have said it's going to be a little piece of the Vatican. Then the community's expectations at least would have been realistic.

"There's great concern here that what we characterized as the public process of approving this deal was actually a charade, a charade that was really a mockery of the public process," Rogan added.

And ACLU Attorney Stephen Clark indicates that last night's decision may have actually given him more ammunition, because the amendment was approved without a public hearing. He told the Salt Lake Tribune he hasn't decided whether to keep pursuing the second lawsuit, or to drop it, "The charade and the mockery continues," Clark said. "The council tonight proposes to rewrite history, but it can't erase the past."


[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 Kent Larsen · Privacy Information