ALL the News about
Mormons, Mormonism
and the LDS Church
Mormon News: All the News about Mormons, Mormonism and the LDS Church
For week ended March 26, 2000 Posted 24 Feb 2001
Most Recent Week
Front Page
Local News
Arts & Entertainment
·New Products
·New Websites
·Mormon Stock Index
Letters to Editor
Continuing Coverage of:
Boston Temple
School Prayer
Julie on MTV
Robert Elmer Kleasen
About Mormon News
News by E-Mail
Weekly Summary
Submitting News
Submitting Press Releases
Volunteer Positions
Bad Link?

News about Mormons, Mormonism,
and the LDS Church
Sent on Mormon-News: 27Mar00

Summarized by Kent Larsen

LDS Church Opposes ACLU's Amendment To Main Street Lawsuit
Salt Lake Tribune 24Mar00 N1
By Joe Baird: Salt Lake Tribune


LDS Church opposes ACLU's amended lawsuit
Deseret News 25Mar00 N1
By Hans Camporreales: Deseret News staff writer
But S.L. attorneys aren't objecting to the plaza motion

SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH -- The complexity of the main street lawsuit continues to grow. The LDS Church's attorney's filed a memorandum Thursday opposing the American Civil Liberty Union's attempt to amend its federal lawsuit against Salt Lake City and the LDS Church over the sale of a block of Main Street by the city to the Church. The ACLU is seeking to bolster its claim that restrictions in the sale placed on the use of the property are unconstitutional, violating the First and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The amended lawsuit also argues that the city's administrators obscured facts and skirted city processes to push through the sale.

But while the amendments to the lawsuit mainly deal with the city, it was the LDS Church, rather than the city, that objected to the amendment. In their memorandum, Church attorneys claim that the ACLU "knew or at a minimum should have known" that the allegations in the amendment should have been included in the original lawsuit. They also claim that the amended lawsuit is "futile" because it challenges the city's legislative process, and constitute's "a nonjustifiable interference" with a legislative branch. "If there was indeed an 'administrative sleight of hand' by city staff to dupe the City Council, that is a matter for the City Council to resolve."

ACLU attorney Stephen Clark says the response is "tantamount or similar to a motion to dismiss. They're saying we don't have a claim, and we shouldn't be allowed to scrutinize the details of this deal.

"I guess my reaction is, 'What are they afraid of?' If everything was aboveboard and in the open, why all of the hand-wringing about the plaintiffs' efforts to scrutinize what should have been an open and public process?"

Clark also expressed surprise at the Church's opposition to the amendment. "I think it's very interesting that the city doesn't defend itself but relies on the hired guns from the big outside law firm to come in and make their arguments for them," Clark said. "I'm really just clarifying and strengthening the (constitutional establishment-of-religion clause) claim principally based on my review of documents that were produced after the filing of the original complaint by both the city and the church."

The ACLU has until April 12 to file a response to the Church's objection.


[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 Kent Larsen · Privacy Information